Jason Hummel
We use affiliate links and may receive a small commission on purchases. Read more about us.
A good pair of hiking boots should offer ample support, protection, and comfort for the hiker, regardless of the terrain. We’ve tested hiking boots on many backpacking and day-hiking missions over the years, from multi-day treks in the Patagonian backcountry to fast-and-light missions in the North Cascades Alpine. The boot we reach for most often is La Sportiva’s TX Hike Mid Leather GTX, thanks to its comfort, reliability, and versatility across a range of trails. It’s not out of place on local trails but can perform when you need it, such as on long, technical traverses. Our list also includes more traditional heavyweight hiking boots, lightweight modern hikers inspired by trailrunners, and a few budget-friendly boots, including one under $100. If you’re looking for the utmost protection on soggy trails or in shoulder season hiking, see our guide to the best waterproof hiking boots. And if you prefer to keep things lighter and nimbler, we also have a list of our favorite hiking shoes.
Category: All-around/mountain
Weight: 1 lb. 12.6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: A versatile hiker that’s capable on mellow and technical terrain; great durability.
What we don’t: Some may want a stiffer boot; leather doesn’t dry out quickly.
La Sportiva’s TX collection has traditionally been home to some of our favorite approach shoes (including the TX4), and the TX Hike Mid extends the lineup to hikers and backpackers. The result is a hiking boot that’s very capable in mountain terrain yet still agile, lightweight, and comfortable on long sections of trail. We tested the leather version on a five-day high traverse through Washington’s Glacier Peak Wilderness and found it to be the right tool for the job. It handled the trail approach with ease, and once in the high country, it offered ample stability, traction, and protection for crossing talus fields, boulder-hopping along ridgelines, and trudging up snow (the boot accommodated our aluminum crampons without issue). Unlike many leather boots, we experienced no break-in period thanks to the wide, comfort-focused last, which offers extra space around the mid- and forefoot.
In an effort to remain comfortable and lightweight, the TX Hike does make some sacrifices in protection. Some hikers will want to protect their feet with a burlier, stiffer boot. These designs can bulldoze their way through snow and talus with ease, or support a super heavy backpack, but they can be painful to break in and uncomfortable on long sections of easy trail. In our opinion, the TX Hike is better suited for those seeking something nimble and precise. And the nubuck upper also helps bridge the gap: We found it durable (it suffered very little wear even with consistent crampon use), and it helps isolate the feet from the elements. However, we did have some issues wetting out the waterproofing on a late-spring snowshoeing trip in Tahoe. You may want to opt for the synthetic version if you’re hiking in the rain or are crossing streams often. It all comes down to personal preference, but lightweight footwear is unquestionably the way of the future, and the TX Hike Mid Leather is one of our favorite all-around, mountain-ready designs to date. For more information, read our in-depth review of the La Sportiva TX Hike Mid Leather GTX.
Get the La Sportiva TX Hike Mid Leather GTX
Category: All-around
Weight: 2 lb. 4 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Impressive durability, comfort, and performance for a budget boot.
What we don’t: Takes some time to break in, and it’s not the most breathable.
It’s rare to find a pair of boots for under $100 that can be trusted on the trail, but Nortiv 8 has pulled it off with the Echo Mid. To be honest, we were skeptical about the Echo Mid at first, but after breaking it in on a 10-mile hike on an unmaintained Pacific Northwest trail, we knew it deserved this award. Unlike many cheap hiking boots, the Echo Mid offers a high level of stability, both in the stiff collar and underfoot. Cushioning in the midsole and collar keeps things comfortable, along with the generous toe box. We were also impressed by how well it gripped damp logs and river rocks, and by how reliable the waterproofing is, even above the laces. There’s a lot of boot separating your foot from rocks and roots, and our feet came away feeling fresh after every hike. For those who stick to trail hiking, the Echo Mid is an excellent choice that won’t break the bank.
No budget shoe is without its compromises, and the Echo Mid has a few. For one, the stiff collar takes some time to break in, and while it didn’t leave us with any bruises out of the box, we recommended wearing it around the house before hitting the trails. The boot also runs warm, and it wouldn’t be our first choice for hiking in hot climates. It’s also far from a technical boot; it lacks the nimbleness and groundedness we look for when scrambling or ridge hiking. But for casual hikers and backpackers who aren’t logging serious miles in mountain terrain, the Echo Mid is more than enough boot. And as a final bonus, it’s often found at a discount on Amazon.
Get the Nortiv 8 Echo Mid
Category: Mountain/all-around
Weight: 2 lb. 4 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: A supportive and protective boot that’s still comfortable.
What we don’t: Overkill for many hikers and backpackers.
Dedicated backpackers—especially those traveling over more technical terrain—will want something supportive, protective, and reliable. We’ve consistently reached for our Salomon Quest series boots for backpacking over the years, and that remains the same today. That said, the women’s version of the Quest (called the Echo GTX) deviates from the formula. Not only is the Quest Echo GTX less expensive than the previous Quest 4, but it’s also lighter, which is good news for those wanting to log serious miles. It still has the same bones as the Quest series, including a burly leather upper that can take some serious abuse, and a substantial midsole and outsole that keep the feet protected on rocky or uneven terrain. We also love Salomon’s chassis, which offers fantastic support and keeps the foot in place across all terrain.
We’re currently testing the Salomon Quest Echo GTX and will report back once we’ve logged some more miles on it. We do have some slight concerns with the update, however. For one, the lacing system differs from the men’s Quest 5 and the previous Quest 4, swapping the thick ankle eyelet for a smaller D-ring. The swap might affect the support the lacing provides to the boot, though we don’t expect it to be severe. The Echo GTX also has a shorter collar than the Quest 4, which should better accommodate women’s calves (which are generally lower than men’s), but we could see it limiting support. If these concerns are dealbreakers for you, the previous Quest 4 is available at a discount while supplies last. It’s also worth noting here that the Quest Echo GTX is only available in the US at the time of publication. Outside of the US, Salomon offers a women’s version of the Quest 5. Nitpicks aside, we don’t doubt that Salomon landed on another winning formula with the Quest Echo, and we’re excited to get it out on some multi-day backcountry treks this summer. To learn more, see our in-depth review of the Salomon Quest 4 GTX.
Get the Salomon Quest Echo GTX
Category: All-around
Weight: 2 lb. 2.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: Great support, comfort, and protection for covering long distances with a full pack.
What we don’t: Overkill for easy hiking; only offered in a waterproof version.
Year after year, Lowa’s Renegade is one of the most beloved hiking boots on the trail, combining the look, feel, and performance of a traditional design with a reasonable weight. As we’d expect from a burly leather boot, it features a hardwearing design and a stable construction that translates into great support and protection on technical trails. But the Lowa nails the comfort equation, too: The boot comes in wide, narrow, and regular widths, and it features a tall, stiff collar for noticeable ankle support. Additionally, the latest Evo model features fewer seams to minimize pressure points and an updated midsole for enhanced comfort. All told, the Renegade is a great middle ground between a bulky leather boot and a lightweight synthetic design, making it one of our favorite designs for backpacking trips.
The obvious downside to the Renegade is price, which is the highest on this list. But if you have the cash to spend, it’s likely that the Renegade will last longer than most of the synthetic options on this list. And while it’s a great option for hikers who prioritize support and protection, it will be overkill for some. In the age of fast-and-light travel, many modern trail-goers will be willing to trade some of the Lowa’s strong suits for a synthetic boot that feels lighter and nimbler underfoot. Furthermore, the Renegade is only available in a waterproof version, which is ideal for shoulder seasons or mountainous hikes, but may overheat in warmer conditions. Still, for tricky terrain or long-distance travel with a full pack, the Lowa is a high-quality, durable all-rounder that combines its features better than most. For more information, see our in-depth review of the Lowa Renegade GTX Mid.
Get the Lowa Renegade Evo GTX Mid
Category: Lightweight
Weight: 1 lb. 8 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Flat and roomy footbed offers slipper-like comfort.
What we don’t: Disappointing stability on technical terrain; heavier than the outgoing version.
Altra’s Lone Peak trail running shoe has developed a serious following among comfort-seeking thru-hikers, making the mid-height version an intriguing concept. Combining ankle support and protection with the Lone Peak’s trademark wide toe box, generous cushioning, and zero-drop design, the Hiker 3 offers instant comfort alongside extra performance on variable trail terrain or when carrying a load. Further, it’s among the lightest boots here, which is a game-changer for high-mileage days. We’ve recommended various iterations of the Lone Peak to dozens of friends and acquaintances who’ve struck out with more traditional hiking footwear and have yet to lead anyone astray.
We tested the latest 3 in Canada’s Kootenay backcountry, and found it just as comfortable as the last version (which we dubbed the “mountain slipper”). However, despite the updated heel collar, the latest version still lacks the ankle support of the beefier designs. We also still felt the traction was lacking in wet or rocky terrain, despite the outsole upgrades. But if you’re sticking to established trails and prioritizing comfort and weight savings over all else, the Lone Peak Hiker is a great choice. Altra also offers the Lone Peak 9 Waterproof, which features a taller collar, a synthetic upper, and a waterproof membrane. For more information, see our in-depth review of the Altra Lone Peak Hiker 3.
Get the Altra Lone Peak Hiker 3
Category: Mountain/lightweight
Weight: 1 lb. 10.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: A comfortable, mountain-ready yet lightweight boot.
What we don’t: Low collar limits stability and protection.
Somewhere between a burly mountain boot and a lightweight trail runner lies the Scarpa Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX. This boot is designed for efficient movement in the mountains, with reliability, support, and weight savings as its pillars. Like a mountain boot, it has a very grippy outsole, which performed well on the often-wet trails in the Italian Dolomites where we tested it. A rigid frame offers torsional support, and an EVA midsole provides comfort and protection on rocky trails. Durability is another strong point: The Rush has a durable leather upper and burly rubber reinforcements. We also like the sock-like fit that provides precision on hairy routes.
The Rush 2 Pro doesn’t offer the burly feel of a traditional mountain boot, however. While the shoe itself feels stable and supportive, the low collar doesn’t do much more than keep debris out. It also doesn’t provide adequate protection for deep-water crossings, and once the leather gets wet, it takes a while to dry. The boot is also overkill for most casual trails. But if your idea of a good time involves scrambling to the top of peaks or wandering off trail in the alpine, the Rush 2 Pro is one of the most capable and trustworthy boots we’ve tested. Scrapa’s expertise in the mountain space shows with this boot, and the investment is worth it for those looking for nothing short of the best. To learn more, read our in-depth review of the Scarpa Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX.
Get the Scarpa Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX
Category: Lightweight
Weight: 1 lb. 10.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (eVent)
What we like: Boasts a wide toe box and underfoot support
What we don’t: Runs short in the toe; size up by half a size.
Wide toe box footwear is rising in popularity, and among the brands that do it best is Topo Athletic. The Trailventure 2 WP boot is the only boot in its line so far, but we’ve enjoyed testing it on hiking and backpacking trips in the North Cascades and Canadian Rockies. Unlike Altra’s minimalist shoes, the Trailventure 2 offers more underfoot support, including a rockplate, arch support, and a TPU heel counter. It isn’t as cushy as Altra’s offerings, but we prefer it for hiking on uneven terrain. And it’s still comfortable out of the box, especially at the front of the foot. The mesh upper is very durable, and the waterproofing held up well to stream crossings and dewy forest hiking. And we have no gripes with the outsole, which has yet to fail us on any trail.
The most important downside to note is the sizing, which runs small at the front of the toe, and has led to some painful toe bangs on steep downhill trails. We recommend sizing up by half a size in this boot; that solved the issue for us right away. And like other lightweight boots with short collars, you shouldn’t expect much support above the ankle. Those lugging heavy backpacks on technical terrain may want a heftier boot. We had no problem backpacking on established trails, however, and felt they offered plenty of support when scrambling over river boulders. We’re quick to recommend them to anyone who wants a high-performing trail shoe with some room to splay their toes. For more details, read our in-depth review of the Topo Athletic Trailventure 2 WP.
Get the Topo Athletic Trailventure 2 WP
Category: All-around/lightweight
Weight: 1 lb. 6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: A capable hiker with a classy modern finish.
What we don’t: Lacks ankle support and has shallow lugs.
Truth be told, we don’t often reach for hiking boots when headed out on the town, but the Arc’teryx Kopec Mid has us changing our minds. This sleek mid-height boot has a modern look that, in our opinion, looks far classier than the leather or sporty synthetic models on this list. Aesthetics aside, we were also impressed with this boot’s performance on the trail: Its lightweight build was comfortable out of the box and easy to move in, and they were nimble and precise on tricky terrain. And not only were they reliably waterproof, but our feet didn’t overheat at any point. The material quality meets our expectations of the brand, and after more than 30 miles of rigorous testing, our pair shows minimal wear.
Like most other lightweight synthetic boots on the list, the Kopec isn’t the most supportive. The flexible collar is great for mobility (and we appreciated it on a few scrambles), but you shouldn’t expect stellar support. We also found the shallow lugs to be lacking in traction on loose dirt and mud, although the Vibram outsole proved trustworthy on boulders, loose gravel, and rocky trails. Lastly, it’s worth noting that our white pair collected some stains during testing along the toe bumper and upper (the white color doesn’t help). But overall, our impressions were positive. Plus, we weren’t in a hurry to take these boots off when hitting town for dinner after backpacking—a compliment for both the comfort and styling of these kicks. For a deeper dive, check out our in-depth review of the Arc’teryx Kopec Mid GTX.
Get the Arc’teryx Kopec Mid GTX
Category: All-around/lightweight
Weight: 1 lb. 12 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: Protective yet lightweight, and more durable than the outgoing version.
What we don’t: Stiff underfoot and not as supportive as burlier boots.
Salomon’s X Ultra Mid series has been a top contender for years, and we’d be remiss not to include the updated X Ultra 5 here. The 5 strikes a nice balance between nimbleness, stability, and protection, making it a nice all-around boot for anything short of true technical terrain. We’re big fans of Salomon’s Contagrip rubber, which has proven very reliable over a variety of terrain, from loose dirt to patches of mud and snow. The fifth iteration of this classic features a modernized and more durable Kevlar-reinforced upper, a stiffer collar, and a more hard-wearing outsole. It also retains the beloved “winged” chassis of the outgoing model, which keeps the heel well in place at the back of the boot when the laces are tightened. The cherry on top is the price, which undercuts most premium competitors without sacrificing much performance.
That said, we still have some gripes with the latest design. While stability and durability have significantly improved since version 4, we experienced some fit and underfoot comfort issues in the latest version. Our regular size was too large, which caused some blisters on the trail (we recommend sizing down half a size). The midsole also doesn’t offer much underfoot cushion (replacing the insole with a cushier one should help). To be sure, not everyone will experience fit or comfort issues, and we believe that the 5 is an overall upgrade from the previous version in terms of stability and durability. We still prefer a boot with a stiffer collar for backpacking with heavy loads, but the X Ultra 5 Mid is a nice choice if you’re looking for something lighter and nimbler. For more information, see our in-depth review of the Salomon X Ultra Mid GTX.
Get the Salomon X Ultra 5 Mid GTX
Category: All-around
Weight: 1 lb. 11.1 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (M-Select Dry)
What we like: A legendary boot that’s durable, comfortable, and affordable.
What we don’t: Lacks performance for long days, rough trails, or heavy loads.
Leather hiking boots are normally an investment, but Merrell keeps things reasonable with the Moab Mid 3. More than almost any other boot, the Moab has achieved legendary status for its combination of performance and comfort at a low weight and price. The nubuck leather upper is both protective and durable, while mesh panels along the top and sides allow air to circulate on hot days. In terms of traction, the outsole offers decent grip on everything from hard-packed dirt to rock, and you get a nice amount of cushioning by way of EVA foam in the midsole. We were also impressed with Merrell’s in-house waterproofing, which held up well during a recent and very rainy hiking trip on the Olympic Coast. For hikers and backpackers who stick mostly to maintained trails, we wholeheartedly recommend the Merrell Moab 3 Mid.
What are our gripes with Merrell’s popular budget boot? On technical trails or on wet terrain like mud and snow, traction and stability fall short of those of more premium designs. Further, despite weighing under 2 pounds for the pair, the Moab can feel clunky underfoot, especially if you’re used to a more modern trail runner or lightweight boot. But the leather build is tough to kill, and the Moab is in a class of its own for the price. For enhanced protection, Merrell also offers the boot with a more premium Gore-Tex membrane, which comes at a higher cost but still strikes us as a solid value for what you get. To learn more, see our in-depth review of the Merrell Moab 3 Mid Waterproof.
Get the Merrell Moab 3 Mid Waterproof
Category: Lightweight/mountain
Weight: 1 lb. 9.1 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: A lightweight boot that’s tough enough for the mountains.
What we don’t: On the small side and not a ton of support.
La Sportiva’s Ultra Raptor trail runner has earned legendary status amongst the mountain running community, beloved for its high levels of protection alongside a lightweight, trail-runner-esque build. The mid-height boot includes a protective mid-height collar without sacrificing nimbleness. The supple upper and padded collar and tongue move easily with the foot. We also found the waterproofing very reliable in mud, slush, and shallow stream crossings. Tack on a durable, mountain-ready build with ample foot protection, and the Ultra Raptor 3 is a great choice for fast-moving hikers who want to cover long distances in the alpine.
We love the Ultra Raptor’s energetic feel, but it isn’t our first choice for technical terrain. It’s not as precise in the toe as we’d like for technical scrambles, and the outsole isn’t as grippy as the Scarpa Rush 2 Pro Mid’s. We also felt like it fit narrow in the toe, and our heels slipped around in the back of the boot on steep downhill sections (not everyone will have fit issues, however, and we recommend trying this one on in person before buying). La Sportiva lowered the back of the collar in this update, but it doesn’t keep debris out as well as the previous version. Gripes aside, the Ultra Raptor is far from a bad boot. For long alpine trails or moving fast on mountain routes, it’s a great pick.
Get the La Sportiva Ultra Raptor 3 Mid GTX
Category: All-around
Weight: 1 lb. 13.4 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: A great-fitting boot for a comfortable, smooth ride.
What we don’t: Polarizing looks; outsole lacks durability.
Well, oh well, hiking boots are getting more fun lately. Popular running shoe brand Hoka, known for its lightweight, cushioned designs, has made a significant push into the hiking footwear market. One of our favorites from their lineup is the Anacapa 2 Mid, which features Hoka’s well-known springy midsole, a rockered shape for a smooth ride on the trail, and a beefed-up construction that includes durable nubuck leather and a Gore-Tex waterproof liner. During a backpacking trip in Canada’s Kananaskis wilderness and Colorado’s San Juan Mountains, we were pleased with the Anacapa’s fast-moving personality, which nicely combines a nimble, trail-runner-like feel with good stability and support.
The Anacapa received notable updates to the midsole and upper. With a less intrusive heel counter, additional tongue padding, and a softer midsole, the 2 is more comfortable than its predecessor. Hoka has also enhanced the toe box for increased durability and protection. However, the latest version still features large sections of blown rubber in the midsole that are susceptible to damage from rocky trail use. We also aren’t quick to recommend highly cushioned shoes for those looking to hike on uneven or technical terrain, as they aren’t the most stable underfoot. And it almost goes without saying that the boot’s appearance will be a dealbreaker for some, but we’ve been impressed with the design, which goes a long way to mitigating foot fatigue without compromising much in terms of stability or protection. If you stick mostly to established trails and prioritize cushy comfort, the Anacapa has a lot to offer. For more details, see our in-depth review of the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX.
Get the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX
Women’s boots are designed to fit a woman’s foot. Generally speaking, women have narrower heels and ankles, higher arches, and calves that sit lower on the leg. But women’s boots also come in different colors from their men’s counterparts. There usually aren’t any technical differences in materials or features, but we’ll call out discrepancies when they do happen. While the majority of our female friends wear women’s boots, some women might be better off opting for a men’s model (particularly for those with high-volume feet and ankles). As with all clothing and footwear, your best bet is to try on before buying.
Value is at the forefront of our minds when evaluating footwear, and in this update, we removed a couple of boots because their prices are too high to compete with our other recommendations. La Sportiva’s Nucelo High II GTX and Danner’s Mountain 600 Leaf GTX boots performed well in testing (particularly the Nucleo High II), but, in our opinion, there are boots that perform similarly at much lower prices. For more information, read our in-depth review of the La Sportiva Nucleo High II GTX.
Similarly, we tested and liked the Vivobarefoot Tracker Forest ESC, but the high price keeps us from recommending it. The barefoot style is also niche, and we can’t recommend it to those accustomed to more traditional footwear with ample support and protection. We also found the leather construction slow to dry and not very breathable.
We tested the Icebug Rover 2 Mid RB9X and liked the traction it provided on muddy and wet forest trails, but we found the Boa lacing system tough to customize for a proper fit. To get enough support for steep downhill trails, we had to crank it tight, which caused discomfort at the ankle. The boot is also thick and warm, and we can’t recommend it for summer hiking.
Finally, we tested the Scarpa Moraine Mid, but it didn’t stand out from the competition. We also felt it was unsupportive and clunky on the trail, and the fit was hard to get right.
While loving backpacking isn’t a prerequisite to working at Switchback Travel, all of our female editors happen to thoroughly enjoy slinging on heavy packs, slipping on our favorite pair of hiking boots, and hitting the trail. Editor Maddie Downie now writes and researches this guide. Raised in the foothills of Colorado, Maddie grew up hiking portions of the Colorado Trail and summiting 14ers, and that love for hiking has followed her to Washington state.
Our most recent testing trip took us to Alberta’s Kananaskis wilderness. Our three-day trek took us through a variety of terrain, ranging from groomed trails to steep talus and rooted, overgrown forest. On these sorts of trips, each boot shows its colors quickly. We evaluate fit out of the box and throughout our trek, pay attention to waterproofing and breathability as we cross rivers and streams in hot temperatures, and keep an eye on each part of the shoe throughout testing. As always, we’ll keep trying out new and noteworthy boots as they hit the market, and we’ll update the list above to reflect our current favorites.
Lightweight
Perhaps no single piece of gear epitomizes the lightweight revolution more clearly than the lightweight hiking boot. These designs are flexible, cushioned (we see a lot of EVA foam here), and—of course—lightweight, which makes them a comfortable and speedy choice for fast-and-light enthusiasts and well-conditioned hikers. And even though some boots in our lightweight category look like trail running shoes, it’s important to note that they offer a stiffer, more stable underfoot feel. However, compared to models in our all-around or mountain categories, lightweight boots are much less supportive and protective overall (especially at the ankle), and their durability can fall short of burlier boots. Some of our favorites in this category include the Altra Lone Peak Hiker 3 and the Topo Athletic Terraventure 2 WP.
All-Around
Our all-around category represents the core of the market, spanning from lightweight synthetic designs to more traditional leather models. All of these boots extend above the ankle and offer great support and protection through sturdy outsoles, stiff midsoles (look for additions like a TPU shank), generous rand and toe bumpers, and robust upper materials. Boots on the lighter end of the spectrum (like Salomon’s X Ultra 5 Mid) will feel more sprightly underfoot at the cost of durability and support, while beefy designs like the Lowa Renegade Evo GTX Mid are better suited for those looking for a traditional hiking boot feel. Most hikers and backpackers will settle for a boot in our all-around category, while those with particular needs can opt for a lightweight or mountain boot.
Mountain
Most of the designs on our list offer ample support for rooty and rocky trails, but when the going gets tougher (think off-trail terrain or sustained snow), you might want more boot. Somewhere on the spectrum between hiking boot and mountaineering boot, designs in our mountain category are the most robust here and go one step further than a traditional hiker in terms of support (look for taller collars and stiffer midsoles), durability and protection (most feature leather uppers), and traction. Given their rigidity, these boots also pair with aluminum crampons better than more flexible options. Mountain boots will be overkill on established trails, but those venturing into the alpine or carrying a heavy load will appreciate the added performance. On the other hand, experienced hikers and those with strong feet can get away with lighter-weight designs like the La Sportiva TX Hike Mid GTX and Scarpa Rush 2 Pro Mid GTX.
Looking at our list above, women’s hiking boots range from ultralight designs, such as the Arc’teryx Kopec Mid GTX (1 lb. 6 oz.), to sturdy mountain-ready models that weigh well over 2 pounds per pair, like the Salomon Quest Echo GTX. In general, the weight spec can tell us a lot about a boot: A lighter design will be less protective, supportive, and durable overall, but the benefits include less strain on the body (as the saying goes, a pound on the foot equals five on the back) and more flex and cushion, which often translate to increased comfort. Hikers and backpackers will want to aim for that sweet spot between performance and weight. If you’re sticking to the trail with a light load, you can get away with a lightweight hiking boot, while those hauling extra gear or traveling cross-country will appreciate the added support of a heavier boot.
Hiking boots are designed to be stable underfoot, which typically involves a firm outsole and a hard plastic shank inserted between the midsole and outsole. The length of the plastic can vary from just under the arch to the full length of the boot, depending on intended use. The benefit of a stiff boot is that with a solid platform, the feet will not have to work as hard during ascents and descents, and on off-camber terrain. For this reason, boots in our mountain category are among the stiffest, making them a great choice for off-trail travel with a heavy load. On the other end of the spectrum, lightweight boots generally forgo the additional structure of a shank, which results in greater flexibility but less overall stability.
For day hikes on less technical terrain or if you’re aiming to move fast and light, we can’t recommend a lightweight and flexible hiking boot enough. Boots like the La Sportiva Ultra Raptor 3 Mid GTX or Altra Lone Peak Hiker 3 are standouts for these uses, provided that you’re well-conditioned and have no pre-existing ankle issues. As your trips get longer and your pack gets heavier, a more substantial boot with increased ankle support is a better choice, such as the Lowa Renegade Evo GTX Mid. At the extreme end, mountain boots like the Salomon Quest Echo are excellent for hiking in areas that require maximum support, such as off-trail bushwhacking, traversing exposed terrain, or trekking over rough ground.
The majority of hiking boots are waterproof, keeping your feet dry while crossing streams, dodging puddles, or hiking in light rain. Most designs achieve this by inserting a waterproof and breathable membrane just inside the outer fabric. Gore-Tex liners are the most popular and reliable (as seen in most of the designs on this list), but even in-house technologies like Merrell’s M-Select offer similar waterproofing performance (though breathability can suffer with some of these designs). In addition to the membrane, most boots also feature a water-repellent coating on the outside that helps bead up and shed water droplets.
But before springing for a waterproof boot, it is worth asking if you need the added protection. There are several downsides to this technology: the extra layer adds weight, significantly reduces breathability, and increases costs. Furthermore, if you do happen to get water inside your boot (which can easily occur in deep snow or water), it doesn’t drain as well and won’t dry out nearly as quickly as a non-waterproof option. In the end, we appreciate the added assurance of a waterproof boot for shoulder-season hiking or backpacking in the mountains, but recommend a non-waterproof design for summer hikes or uniquely hot and dry environments, such as the Utah desert. For more on the waterproofing debate, see our article Do You Need Waterproof Hiking Shoes?
Regardless of what marketers claim, making a boot waterproof affects its breathability. By keeping water out, less moisture (your sweat) can quickly escape from the inside, which means all forms of waterproof footwear can run warm in the summer months. There are, however, significant differences between boot models in their ventilation. We’ve found that heavyweight leather boots with an in-house waterproof lining are often the worst performers. The Lowa Renegade and Salomon Quest 4 both perform decently, thanks to their nylon and leather construction and Gore-Tex liners, and are completely suitable for summer backpacking trips. And if you are willing to ditch the waterproof lining altogether, boots like the Merrell Moab 3 Mid and Altra Lone Peak Hiker 3 are great options for hikers and backpackers.
Laces are often overlooked features on hiking boots, but they play a crucial role in ensuring fit and comfort. Most laces extend to the ankle with standard eyelets and continue up the collar using hooks that come completely undone, so you can get in and out of your boot with ease. Some of the more advanced designs feature locking hooks at the ankle, which both lock your foot in place and allow you to tailor your fit throughout (loose in the forefoot to accommodate swelling and tight around the ankle for stability, for example). Occasionally, we see single-pull speed lace designs or Boa systems used in hiking boots. While we’re fans of the convenience of these quick-lace systems in a hiking shoe, it’s a trickier sell for us in a mid-height boot, since you only get one option for tightening or loosening, compared to the versatility of a standard design.
A hiking boot’s upper refers to the material above the outsole and the midsole—essentially, all of the fabric that surrounds your foot. Most often, a boot’s upper is made with a mix of synthetic materials (typically nylon), mesh, and leather. The type of material directly correlates with the boot’s durability, water resistance, breathability, and weight.
Synthetic Nylon and Mesh
Woven nylon and open mesh nylon panels are common on boots in our lightweight and all-around categories. These synthetic materials typically excel in terms of breathability and weight savings, but they tend to dry out more quickly when wet. However, they are not known for their durability, and don’t offer as much protection as a thicker leather boot. Synthetic materials also don’t conform to your foot over time as leather does, but in most cases, the overall fit is still comfortable and snug. Many designs here feature synthetic uppers, while others (like the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX) combine synthetic and leather for the best of both worlds.
Suede or Nubuck Leather
Suede and nubuck leather have a very similar brushed appearance and are common sights on hiking boots in our all-around and mountain categories (the lightweight Lone Peak Hiker 3 is also made of suede). Both materials are lighter and more flexible than traditional full-grain leather, which means they offer greater breathability and an easier break-in period, are less prone to scuff marks, and shave precious ounces from your feet. Expect nubuck to be tougher than suede (suede is derived from the underside of an animal’s skin, while nubuck comes from the outside), which is why we see it used more in heavy-duty hiking boots like the La Sportiva TX Hike Mid Leather GTX. Ultimately, both materials are excellent alternatives to thick, full-grain leather and are more prevalent in today’s modern boots.
Full-Grain Leather
Compared to nubuck and suede, full-grain leather is thicker, stiffer, and tougher overall. You’ll find one-piece leather uppers on high-end boots, such as the Zamberlan Vioz GTX. These designs are neither lightweight nor breathable, but they’re incredibly tough and water-resistant. Leather does require some maintenance to keep in good shape (you’ll want to treat it with a conditioner like Nikwax), but the payoff is a solid construction that’s built to outlast every other boot. As an added bonus, some designs can be resoled, so you don’t need to replace the whole boot when the lugs wear down.
Hiking on uneven terrain or while carrying a heavy load can put considerable stress on your feet, so you’ll want to ensure your hiking boots offer a sturdy platform. Combined with the rubber outsole, the midsole plays an essential role in stability, shock absorption, and protection from sharp rocks underfoot. Depending on the design, midsoles vary from very thin and flexible (as in lightweight boots) to stiff and substantial (as seen in leather mountain boots). Most include EVA foam, TPU, or both in their construction.
EVA
The majority of lightweight hiking boots utilize EVA foam in their midsoles. The cushy, soft material takes some of the sting out of your heel or midfoot impacts and is also lightweight. Not all EVA should be treated equally, and proprietary versions can vary from super-soft to mildly stiff. For logging serious miles on tougher terrain, we prefer a firm and supportive midsole over excessive cushioning. If we’re planning to move quickly on an easy trail, softer cushioning is a better bet and is commonly found in trail-running-inspired designs, such as the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid. However, soft midsoles tend to break down over time, so expect these boots to pack out more quickly than dedicated hiking boots.
TPU
For tougher applications or when you want to isolate your feet from rough impacts, manufacturers will use a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) midsole. This durable material is far less cushy than EVA but provides better protection and stability underfoot; for this reason, it’s common in boots in our all-around and mountain categories but not used in the trail-runner-inspired designs. Boots with TPU in their midsoles will also keep their shape longer and won’t compress like EVA. Because both midsole types have valid applications, it’s common for a manufacturer to use a TPU frame or heel for stability and toughness, and to add EVA underfoot for increased comfort.
One of the hallmarks of a hiking boot is its ability to provide good traction on a variety of terrain. In a way that casual footwear can never match, hiking and trail-running footwear are leaps and bounds better when the going gets rocky, slippery, and steep. Vibram is the gold standard for outsole rubber, but not all Vibram compounds should be treated equally: the rubber manufacturer tailors its blends and designs to specific footwear and brands. Some boots feature much larger, sharper lugs underfoot for serious grip in mud, while others prioritize sticky rubber for scrambling over rocks. There are also more entry-level options that just do well on easier trails, like the lugs you’ll find on the bottom of the Merrell Moab 3 Mid Waterproof.
There are also plenty of in-house rubbers that perform on par with Vibram. We’ve had great luck with Salomon’s Contragraip outsole for all-around hiking. Scarpa’s Presa outsole and La Sportiva’s TX outsole are very reliable on scrambles and more technical terrain. We’ve even had luck with budget options, such as the rubber on the Nortiv 8 Echo Mid’s outsole.
Toe caps or rubber rands cover the front of many hiking boots, and we consider them an essential element of backpacking boot design. These thick pieces of rubber are there to keep your toes in one piece should you accidentally kick a rock on the trail. To cut weight, some manufacturers occasionally remove or reduce this feature. After stubbing our toes multiple times while scrambling a 14er in a minimalist hiking boot, we definitely prefer it to include more substantial toe protection.
Getting a proper fit can be a real pain, and in many cases, the culprit is a generic, flat insole. Thankfully, removing your stock insoles is easy, and replacing them with an aftermarket model that’s specifically designed for your foot size and shape can remedy most boot maladies. New insoles can provide more or less volume to fill out the boot, improve the fit under the arch, and adjust the cushioning and impact shock. We recommend checking out Superfeet insoles for their wide selection of options and trusted reputation in running shoes, ski boots, and hiking footwear.
Each style has its respective strengths, and we use them interchangeably for hiking and backpacking trips. The key differentiators are protection, stability, and weight. For rocky terrain, water crossings, snow, and carrying a heavy backpacking pack, we prefer a boot. On the other hand, a low-top style trims away material and weight, making it the clear choice for those focused on moving fast and light without a large pack (especially in milder weather conditions or on easy trails). Lightweight mid-height designs can be a nice middle ground, with some of the added protection of a boot alongside the nimble feel of a shoe. There isn’t a definite right answer in this debate, but the weight of your gear and your hiking style can make the decision much simpler.
First things first, you’ll need a boot that fits properly. When trying on a boot in the store, note any rubbing or hotspots. If you feel it in the store, you’ll feel it amplified on the trail. A properly-fitting boot should hug the heel and keep it in place at the back, and your toes shouldn’t slide forward and strike the end of the boot. Too stiff collars can also lead to blistering. Next, wear a moisture-wicking, breathable hiking sock. A wet foot is more likely to blister, so avoid thick wool socks that hold onto heat and sweat. If you know you’re prone to blisters no matter what, there are a few measures you can take. Taping the area with athletic tape can reduce rubbing (we like Leuko Tape), and we’ve also had luck pre-treating our socks with Gold Bond powder, which helps with moisture management. Hiking in a breathable, non-waterproof hiking boot can go a long way toward preventing soggy feet and blisters.
In most cases, what you give up by opting for a boot under $100 is durability and performance. To stay affordable, budget boots often use cheaper materials, such as synthetic uppers and soft rubber outsoles. While the boot might be comfortable and grippy out of the box, it’s less likely to hold up in the long term; the uppers will form holes, and the outsole will wear down. Performance is affected, too. Cheaper boots have less grippy outsoles, unsupportive midsoles, and generic fits that prioritize comfort over precision. Performance and durability start to improve around the $150 mark, with more premium upper materials (such as leather), precise fits, and very reliable outsoles that can handle a range of trail terrain. Durability also improves with more quality materials, and the outsoles and uppers can withstand regular use. Boots above $200 generally perform best in specific niches, such as backpacking, technical hiking, or fast-packing. That said, if you’re a weekend hiker who doesn’t wander more than a few miles on established trails, a boot under $100 is likely to be plenty. There’s no need to spend more unless you’re a dedicated mountain hiker who relies on their footwear for safety and performance.
If comfort is the priority, a boot with a cushy midsole is a great choice. Those recovering from foot injuries or experiencing plantar fasciitis will appreciate the cushioned ride. Or, if you’re a casual hiker who just wants to be comfortable outside, there’s nothing wrong with a cushioned shoe. The downsides become apparent on more technical trails, however. Most boots with generous midsoles forego a rockplate, instead relying on the EVA midsole material to protect the foot from rocks and roots. Most of the time, this gets the job done, but if you’re hiking long distances over rocky terrain, the lack of protection will become more evident. We also don’t recommend shoes with thick midsoles for precarious hikes where balance matters, as these shoes can feel tippy or insecure on uneven terrain. But for long stretches of established trails, there are a lot of benefits to a cushioned boot.
Maddie Downie is an Editor at Switchback Travel, where she’s contributed mainly to backpacking, skiing, and snowsports content. Prior to joining the Switchback team, she freelanced for GearJunkie and wrote for several local outdoor magazines. Originally from Colorado, she is now based in Bellingham, Washington, after completing her master’s degree at Western Washington University. She spends her weekends almost exclusively in the North Cascades, skiing, rock climbing, and mountaineering.
Switchback Travel is a part of AllGear Digital’s portfolio of media brands.
Switchback Travel is a part of AllGear Digital’s portfolio of media brands.
